Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moazzam Mirza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Moazzam Mirza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a repeatedly recreated and deleted article and was also salted for a while. I'm bringing it so soon to AfD as I've seen prior versions over the past few years and there's no real difference in this. No new reliable source references included (only blog and user contents sites) or available in a search either. It has also twice been deleted by a PROD, so not eligible for that. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete obvious, but I've already deleted 2 articles by this editor as blatant copyvio, and this article was created yesterday, but an identical blog post is dated to the 24th.. This post is in part about Islamic Call & Guidance Foundation, and see the promotion in Talk:Islamic Call & Guidance Foundation. I expect to find a lot more copyvio. Dougweller (talk) 14:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources found to establish notability of this person. All refs in the article are unreliable - blog posts or user-editable sites.Dialectric (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Mr. Spiff please not delete my pages i am give most of references like Moazzam Mirza page, pleace... Please, no delete„ please Mr. spiff... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beypeople (talk • contribs) 05:59, September 29, 2013‎ (UTC)


 * Comment Even the version created by Beypeople 11:09, 1 September 2012 was a copy of a 2011 blog post by a "BegPeople" who is apparently the same editor, see User:Beypeople He's copying his own material though in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs)
 * Comment Meant to add that the best idea is not to dl for copyvio as it seems to be the article creator's original material, but carry on through AfD and salt if the decision is to delete. Dougweller (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Potential copyvio issues aside, fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. Abecedare (talk) 01:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.