Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mob Figaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   procedural close. It is apparent that bundling these articles together is not a good idea. Speedy renomination of individual articles is permitted. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 23:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Mob Figaz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

While this band does seem to exist, I cannot find any evidence that it has accomplished the feats claimed in the article: Billboard's web site does not confirm that they have been on the charts there, and the sources I found were blogs, not reliable published sources.

Related articles included in this nomination:
 * The Jacka
 * Rydah J. Klyde
 * AP.9 (Rapper) FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The Jacka for multiple charted albums on a major Billboard chart, and keep Rydah J. Klyde for three albums on a notable label. Undecided on the other two, for which the A7 was removed by someone who's claiming there's notability but isn't proving it. They both look like slam-dunk A7s to me, but since they've already been untagged… Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:48, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Bundled in this AfD are a couple of rappers that clearly meet WP:MUSIC; if any single one doesn't meet it, the article should be listed separatel. Chubbles (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - (relating to Mob Figaz only, I haven't looked at the others) per WP:MUSICBIO criterion #2. Assuming the truth of the claims in the article, their album C-Bo's Mob Figaz charted 63 on Billboard's Top R&B Albums chart, which are a major national US chart, satisfying the criterion of "has had a charted single or album on any national music chart." - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Further - this should be the link you need to establish the accuracy of its chart history. I'll go add it to the article. - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.