Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MobiAccess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

MobiAccess

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article on something (I honestly have no idea what a "mobile development framework focusing on platform independence" is) that fails notability criteria. A search for sources turned up no reliable sources that were independent of the subject. G11 tag was removed by an IP that is not the article creator, but geolocates to Budapest, which is where the parent company of MobiAccess is located (and which I suspect is affiliated with that company given the use of "we" in this edit). If this article is deleted, it should be protected from re-creation, as it has already been speedied twice. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:20, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Seems to be just another back office software product, having something to do with programming mobile telephones and touchscreen gadgets. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  Googling suggests they don't exist.  This product could become notable in the future but Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.  Msnicki (talk) 16:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete As Smerdis notes, a non-notable software product. When a press release is the closest thing to a reliable source, we should say no. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can see how a developement environment that allows cross platorm applications could be significant, but it is definitely WP:TOSOON, or possibly it will just never pass WP:N.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Millermk90 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.