Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MobiControl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | communicate _ 20:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

MobiControl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable product by non-notable company (note I also noted the software vendor SOTI for deletion). Ultimately all the article does is say "the software exists". Biker Biker (talk) 19:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:V requires that the information in every article be independently verifiable.  If I remove the information in this article that is only available on the company's own web site, and the information that is only available in press releases, there is no information left with which to build an article.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. - as above Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like mainly press releases and unreliable sources. Appears to fail general notability guidelines at this time. SarahStierch (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails general notability criteria. I would also note that the creator of this article, User:Derrickv, only edits to promote MobiControl or SOTI, and uploaded an image claiming to speak for "MobiControl head office" concerning copyright. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:08, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:08, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Almost qualifies as spam considering the single purpose nature of the editor and the lack of independent coverage. Mkdw talk 21:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - While numerous press releases exist about this product, the topic appears to fail WP:N at this time. Source searches have not yielded significant coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Non-notable product by non-notable company. It is all... Samuel petan (talk) 13:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.