Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobidea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Mobidea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be an advert for an MLM scam, referenced to its own publications Maproom (talk) 11:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

I've noticed that the page I've just created was marked for "deletion" even though it already has a number of credible sources pointing to it. This page is not an attempt to advertise for an MLM scam.
 * João - Mobidea

How should I proceed without risking to make my actions ultimately contribute to the removal of this page?

Best, João Joaofgaguiar (talk) 11:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - so many references but so little content. I cannot fathom whether this is a scam or not. I am not even sure whether it is written in English or in some sort of marketing business gabble, but whatever it is it has no references that show that it has any notability. The refs seems to be advertisements or directory listing but nothing at all substantial. Since there is so little assertion of notability, this might have been a speedy delete as a non notable company (I think?)  Velella  Velella Talk 20:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Vellela,

I see the point. I will try to emphasize the content. Thanks for your words! Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaofgaguiar (talk • contribs) 21:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - References are insufficient. There are plenty of them in terms of numbers, but they are either not independent (paid adverts, press releases, etc) or they are not in depth articles in reliable sources. - MrOllie (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete; clearly fails WP:CORP, and no extensive coverage in independent nor reliable sources is available. Best, FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  02:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.