Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobikade (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. GB fan 02:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Mobikade
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I closed the last AFD as "no consensus" because I felt that none of the 2 participants provided a policy based reason as to why this article should be deleted. Since then I did my own web search to see if this article meets WP:WEB. The only thing I found aside from press releases and such was this which is already in the article. Now this looks like a supersource but WP:WEB and WP:GNG require multiple supersources. Now my "google fu" is not strong so if somebody can find 1 (but preferably 2 or more) just like it, then I will be happy to withdraw this nomination. I also reviewed the first AFD and while it was a unanimous "keep", none of the !voters seemed certain about whether or not the sources in the article were reliable and the first "keep" !vote actually looked more like a "delete" argument. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete already, no sources found beyond what the nominator dug up. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I saw a couple sentences here, but not enough more than what Ron already noticed to evidence WP:GNG has been met. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Decker (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.