Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Suit Gundam: Gundam vs. Zeta Gundam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 02:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Mobile Suit Gundam: Gundam vs. Zeta Gundam

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

un-sourced, non-notable fancruft βcommand 17:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep It is unsourced, but appears to be an actual video game. Edward321 22:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Isn't there something this could be merged into? Wryspy 23:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment you could create a list of Gundam based video games and merge it there. 132.205.99.122 23:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have removed unsourced data, added news and independent reviews and tagged it as a stub. I have neither played the game nor know other websites considered reliable other than IGN or Gamespot so expansion is more than welcome. -- Lenticel  ( talk ) 23:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and add relevant tags No sources is a reason to add cleanup tags, not to AfD. AfD is not meant to force article cleanup.
 * Also, fancruft is a perjorative term and should not be used as it merely inflames debate. Jtrainor 02:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * " a reason to add cleanup tags," - this comment from this editor makes me laughGundamsRus 13:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You're trolling, but I'll respond anyways. Cleanup tags should be added to articles that are in bad shape and need work. You, on the other hand, add them only to articles edited by myself and User:MalikCarr despite the generally high quality of those articles. Jtrainor 17:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Not a very good article, but an article on a game that saw a fair bit of mainstream critical commentary, as well as international mainstream release. This could easily be turned into a proper article. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 20:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.