Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Suit Gundam 00 the Movie: Awakening of the Trailblazer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Snow Close (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *poke* 01:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Mobile Suit Gundam 00 the Movie: Awakening of the Trailblazer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Little notability, badly written article with little materials other than lengthy plot summary, little sources citing real-life impact Joppyhoppy (talk) 13:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, It seems there can be reception information found for it, though it currently needs work. DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 13:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The film was released nationwide, so it passes WP:NFILM in that respect. The article needs a lot of work, but that is not a reason to delete it. At most it could be merged into Mobile Suit Gundam 00 for which this film is a coninuation of. —Farix (t &#124; c) 14:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as meeting all necessary notability requirements. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 16:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree the above users/editors. This should be retain. The source material came out before sources became established. Article should be revised and shorten meet Wikipedia guide lines. -- Colt9033 (talk) 03:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article is notable, and although it needs some working on, that shouldn't be the reason for deletion. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 05:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per meeting WP:NF. Addressable issues are not a reason to delete.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article is imperfect, but meets WP:NF as it was released nationwide. --Malkinann (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. CSE hits. Apparently also shown in Singapore. --Gwern (contribs) 18:00 4 January 2011 (GMT)
 * Snow Keep per above, an AfD is not a place to send an article that just needs work done on it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The Reception section does say it was shown in a lot of theaters, and made millions of dollars. Its notable.  Remember, AFD is not cleanup.   D r e a m Focus  07:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Major movie productions are notable. I'm surprised this was listed on afd. ScienceApe (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Meets all notability requirements, and like the TV series, will likely see a worldwide release as soon as it gets translated. Article definitely needs editing for synopsis length and the addition of other standard movie information, but not outright deletion.the_one092001 (talk) 00:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment With 12 people going for keep here and none against, does this warrent an early closure? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.