Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobiscope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 01:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Mobiscope

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable Gadget? Seems pretty promo to me. Dengero (talk) 08:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 08:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as unashamedly promotional text for a thoroughly nn product. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment I declined speedy deletion, it's not purely promotional.  So Why  13:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In C:CSD, "about a product or company" and "purely promotional" are nearly synonyms. Don't worry about it. Wily D  17:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - easy to find sources to establish notability . Wily D 17:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Most of the results appear to be either republications of press releases, or simple identification of the publishing company by their products. No independent reviews or descriptions. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 21:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete (G11) — Notable or not, this is blatant advertisement. MuZemike  ( talk ) 18:18, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Such a suggestion has already been rejected as the article in no way resembles a blatant advertisement. Wily D 05:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * delete as a non-notable software product. The sources from Wily's Google News search all seem to be press releases. Note that after a speedy has been declined, or anyone argues to keep any article, an article is no longer eligible for speedy deletion. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.