Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobpon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete --Allen3 talk 01:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Mobpon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Website advert with no claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. Gsearch turns up lots of hits, none of which show notability; gnews turns up a single hit that is not about this site. Contested prod. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Mobpon's wiki page was created to inform the public about what we are trying to do for customers, businesses and the environment. As you can see our economy is currently in a rut right now and we as customers and business owners need to come together and make our lives more simple. Stimulus check? What a joke. With gas prices as high as they are my check will be gone in a month. We have a small solution that can give a bit of relief to us as customer and even business owner as well. The answer to our problem is in the website called Mobpon.com. Customers want deals right now so if they find them they will be apt to spend more. Businesses need cheap marketing. It's like a self stimulus. Mobpon never uses paper thus saving the environment. If we the consumer and business owners work together we can improve our economy. We are working to put more information on our wiki page to let people know about what Mobpon was created for. Thank you for your time.

Daniel Ellis —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xfactor54 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I see nothing that leads me to believe this article can meet any of the criteria of WP:WEB, and it clearly fails to meet the intent, in that it describes the content of the site and fails to discuss the encyclopedic relevance of the site. gnfnrf (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability is shown for this web based business.  Wikipedia is not in the business of offering free advertising to non-notable businesses, even if it would stimulate the economy if we did.  That has to be one of the more clever and original arguments to keep a spammy article I've seen in some time, though. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as a spammy advert created by Xfactor54 who says above that he is deeply involved with this non-notable company. - Dravecky (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The Admins are ridiculous. With all the underlining jabs i feel like im in a chatroom with teenagers. I hope this update is to your liking Wiki-Admin Gods. --Xfactor54 (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest again (as I suggested in my response on my talk page) that you read WP:Notability and WP:WEB. I'll even through in WP:SPAM for good measure. Wikipedia does have guidelines, which have been decided on by the whole community, not just admins. If you'd like to help write articles that meet the guidelines, we'll be glad to help as much as we can. -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  20:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I would greatly appreciate that. I'm working hard on getting Mobpon into the public. Not just for commercial use but because contrary to what some admins think the cycle between consumer and business owner is wide in the U.S. And lower prices are the only thing that is going to make americans spend money. I want to adhere to every rule in Wikipedia it seems like they're to many to keep up with. Maybe you should come up with a service that builds business owners wiki pages. Whatever you say needs to be edited, will be edited. Thank you for your time.


 * The basic rule to follow is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, as simple as that. There's a long list of what Wikipedia is not but it's quite clearly not for business development, not for advertising, and not for any entity that has not received notice in reliable secondary sources. This entry fails those basic tests. - Dravecky (talk) 17:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - If and when the site gets some reliable coverage, at that time, it may meet criteria. "I'm working hard on getting Mobpon into the public." Wikipedia is not a place to gain attention, momentum, or exposure for a product/service/website. It's a place for things that already have established notability. Ask yourself: 50 years from now, if nothing more were to come of this site Mobpon(than what's presented on the current article), would it warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia? If you answer yes how relevant is an encyclopedia that lists millions of things that never garnered much attention (like my 6th birthday party or my uncle Lou's BBQ sauce) Faradayplank (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Good talk admins i understand. I will not fight the deletion anymore. Best wishes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.250.118.30 (talk) 18:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete obvious spam, COI notwithstanding. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. So spammy, should've been speedy deleted.Wiki11790 talk 01:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.