Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobrown

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – malathion talk 06:56, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Mobrown
Band vanity, just released their first EP, only local shows. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete They don't fit WP:Music standards as this article is at the time. Hamster Sandwich 07:15, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I cannot find anything notable besides a local 'zine mention or two. Eldereft 07:22, 7 August 2005 (UTC).
 * Keep. Leave them alone. It is interesting and useful information for those wanting to find out more. What is the point of an online encylcopedia if something has to be known by everyone before it is acceptable. SimonWoolford 07:30, 7 August 2005 (UTC).
 * User's 4th edit. Wikibofh 14:41, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

KEEP: Mobrown are at the forefront of the London unsigned music scene which gave us The Libertines / Special Needs etc, and are hot tips for getting a deal by the end of the year. As such, there are many young music lovers who would find this information invaluable.
 * Delete per Hamster Sandwich. Mistercow 10:34, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't appear to meet WP:Music. Capitalistroadster 17:13, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn band vanity. -- Etacar11   22:54, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.33 (talk • contribs) 14:24, August 10, 2005

Keep. Yeah leave them be. I'm from Hull and i've heard of them
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.33 (talk • contribs) 14:28, August 10, 2005


 * keep. so what's wp music policy then?--195.93.21.33 14:30, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It can be found at WP:MUSIC Wikibofh 14:42, August 10, 2005 (UTC)


 * keepthey're a really good band. just because they've only released one ep doesn't mean they don;t deserve to be onb here!
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.33 (talk • contribs) 14:32, August 10, 2005


 * KEEPat least i tried is a tune!
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.33 (talk • contribs) 14:34, August 10, 2005


 * KEEP And watch them grow - will be BIG soon135.196.109.101 14:37, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP I would have hoped as a regular reader of Wikipedia, that the purpose was to provide information to the masses as much as possible. The deletion of this article will stifle the growth of Wikipedia. Perhaps there is the need for more information, in which case I'll write more when the article's status is confirmed. Having said that, who wants to win a grammy to be considered anyway? I have twelve grammy's at home. (Unsigned vote by, first edit)

KEEP. They are gonna be HUGE (Unsigned vote by, first edit)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.