Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mock & Sweet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Mock & Sweet
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has been around for 1 year and has made no attempt to show notability. None of the staff listed have any notability either. じん   ない  05:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.    じん   ない  05:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. According to WP:OUTCOMES, "TV series broadcast nationally by a major network or produced by a major studio are notable". This series has been broadcast internationally. Besides airing in Japan (Nippon Television), it aired in Italy (Odeon TV) and Brazil (Rede Globo).--Nohansen (talk) 06:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NOEFFORT 208.245.87.2 (talk) 13:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:OUTCOMES, WP:NOEFFORT, and editorial policy. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep provided Nohansen backs up his claims with evidence. I agree with all the other !votes above. - Mgm|(talk) 17:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * seems to cover it... 208.245.87.2 (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Please cite that in the article then.
 * EDIT for clarification: Please cite exactly what ANN reference is being used for in the article as it is unclear. じん   ない  02:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You mean aside from verifying that the TV series exists, and was nationally broadcast, and broadcast in other countries as well? —Quasirandom (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The referencing in the article is unclear. I went and looked at it myself and found it after a while, but it wasn't clear what the reference for the page was being used for since there was so much information on it. じん   ない  16:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Once the facts behind the assertion of notability are verified, even without explicit citation, the rest is a matter of editorial improvement, which per policy does not have a deadline. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.