Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mockplus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Mockplus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to comply with multiple Wikipedia guidelines. It lacks the notability necessary for a Wikipedia article (WP:GNG, specifically WP:COMPANY). It also contains content that is written like an advertisement (WP:SOAP), and it is written from a biased point of view (WP:NPOV) by someone who is likely connected to the subject (WP:AUTO). The article was deleted under PROD and recreated with the PROD's text intact. Cabayi (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It shouldn't be deleted because there is no advertising content from this article, and it should has the chance to get improved, thanks! Doris Deu (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete It is a small start-up by one guy with a mobile app with the same name. Reception of this tool/company is low and only on non-RS blogs and similar media. It seems to be neat and the reviews are positive, but it is far to early to warrant an article for that, due the absence of coverage in actual RS. It is from a Chinese developer. There are some mentions of the product in the Chinese web (like here), but I cant find enough which would allow it to pass the threshold at WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT/WP:NCORP. Due the absence of RS the article should therefore be deleted. Note that the article has been created by two single user-accounts. Dead Mary (talk) 11:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No claim to notability fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Theroadislong (talk) 13:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nomination, except for WP:SOAP, as this has largely been edited out since the original nomination. - Arjayay (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete : Per discussion, fails wiki links listed by the nominator. --Music Boy50 (talk) 02:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I was the one that proposed this article for deletion last time and I was surprised to see it recreated. And while the WP:SOAP problem has been addressed (to a certain extent), the rest of the problems with this article remain, including WP:AUTO, WP:NPOV (to an extent), and the biggest one of them all, WP:GNG/WP:COMPANY. And it is the lattermost issue with this article that can never be addressed. See No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. tl;dr: This article should be deleted and it should not re-emerge until the subject in question has enough notability behind it. Wikipedia is a means to learn more about subjects that already are notable, not a means to make a subject notable (see Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion). Blurp92 (talk) 23:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.