Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modanlı, Ağın


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Modanlı, Ağın

 * – ( View AfD View log )

One of many Turkey geostubs sourced to the unreliable Koyumuz. My redirect was reverted because this article has "more info" which consists of "The village is populated by Kurds of the Modan tribe." I would argue that this is insufficient for a standalone article and should be redirected to Ağın district. –dlthewave ☎ 17:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 17:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 17:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I can't soft-delete this due to the revert, so relisting to try and obtain consensus on what action to take.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Certainly exists. Appears on the map. Passes WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:GEOLAND sets a higher bar than simply appearing on a map. Modanlı fails both #1 (legally recognized populated place) and #2 (case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources). It's currently sourced to Koyumuz, a weather website which is not reliable for geographic information, and Nisanyan Map, which is based on user contributions.
 * This and similar sets of stubs were discussed at ANI, AfD and Wikiproject Turkey with consensus that they were inappropriately mass created and should be deleted or redirected. This article contains no information (other than the unreliably-sourced presence of Kurds) that is not already present in the redirect target. –dlthewave ☎ 01:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No apparent evidence of notability in article or searches. Claims that it passes GEOLAND are not borne out by sources per . Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 04:04, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nytendoz (talk) 17:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The source states a population which would probably mean it passes GEOLAND but I'm not sure that the source is reliable?  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 07:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.