Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modcloth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Even with the conflict of interest and the spa shenanigans on the article's talk page, there appear to be non trivial mentions in multiple sources. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Modcloth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Article creator has admitted COI. Rtphokie (talk) 18:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete per above and notability concerns Lets  drink  Tea  20:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep looks like notability concerns have been resolved with recent source additions. riffic (talk) 04:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability established through coverage in reliable sources, and two of those were already in the reference section when the nomination was made. -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep; there actually may be more, for whoever wants to sift through Google News. Drmies (talk) 03:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —94.196.158.212 (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.