Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model for Assessment of telemedicine - MAST


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Or rather, no discussion...  Sandstein  18:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Model for Assessment of telemedicine - MAST

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are insufficient independent sources to show that this assessment system is notable, per WP:Golden Rule Jytdog (talk) 23:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Not so sure about that. these nine all cite for starters.  refers briefly too, saying "The Model for Assessment of Telemedicine applications [21] was chosen for a systematic analysis and description of outputs for NEXES." Suggest this article be either userfied or moved to draft space for further work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeadSongDog (talk • contribs) 20:14, 22 July 2015‎ (UTC)
 * oh the "cited by"! of those,
 * 1 /  a primary source that uses MAST framework
 * 2 is the same as #1
 * 3 /  (shares authors with prime source) a primary source that uses MAST framework
 * 4 /  mentions MAST in passing; describes a competing system for design and evaluation of telehealth interventions
 * 5 /  is a primary source that uses MAST framework (shares authors with #8)
 * 6 /  is a primary source that uses MAST framework
 * 7 /  cites it only to say it will not discuss it
 * 8 /  is a primary source that uses MAST framework (shares authors with #6)
 * 9 /  gives a passing mention
 * So... not sure if any of those describe MAST per se. I would agree with the recommendation to move to draft space for more work before it comes back to mainspace. Jytdog (talk) 21:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Are we applying too high a standard to an emerging area? Evaluation of telemedicine is in its infancy. Where are we going to find these independent sources?Rathfelder (talk) 17:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 00:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.