Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model of Christian Charity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 22:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Model of Christian Charity

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD which was seconded. "To be an article here the requirements of notability must be met. This is just a sermon, and is not at all notable." Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing that warrants more than a mention of the overall themes of John Winthrop's sermons in the article about the latter. We don't need an article on an individual sermon. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. This sermon, already mentioned in detail in the article John Winthrop, is notable as it laid the guidelines for living as a Puritan. This sermon constitutes the bulk of the article City upon a Hill but should be covered in its own article. Plenty of references exist. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 09:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Following the Google Books links finds multiple books discussing this key text in American religious history. Clearly satisfies WP:N. -- 202.124.73.46 (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  15:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep — Published sermon, which gets almost 400 citations. Obviously notable.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 17:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.