Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modeling site (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 23:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Modeling site
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

As a user said in the previous AfD: There's nothing special or notable with such sites to deserve an article and the text is pretty uninformative - models have websites, suprise, suprise. A few "keep" users asserted the article simply lacks sources, but since that Oct. 2007 discussion, no refs have surfaced, and I doubt there are any to be found to assert that this topic is really notable, especially since there don't seem to be any individually notable examples of such sites to warrant Wikipedia articles of their own. Not to mention, this article's only real use seems to be as a center for promotion judging from how many edits deal with reverting spam ELs.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 20:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As noted by the nominator, what little content there is here doesn't amount to anything (other than being a spam target). Completely unreferenced as well. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 20:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was expecting a directory, but instead I got a long list of tautologies: A portfolio hosting site is a site that hosts portfolios, tribute modeling sites are sites that are tributes to models, etc. Too vacuous for my taste. Hairhorn (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 05:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete What isn't a WP:DICDEF is entirely unsourced. --Cyber cobra (talk) 05:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.