Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modelresource.ca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wickethewok 14:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Modelresource.ca
Appears to be an ad. ~600 hits on google, many of which are the site itself. Da rk Sh ik ar i  13:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

I won't oppose the deletion if it does in fact contravene the policies of self-promotion. Recently - because of the success of Canada's Next Top Model - I've been requested to speak at a lot of events. As the event organizers take proposals to potential third-party sponsors a lot are asking what Modelresource.ca is.

I tried to be fair in what I wrote (not listing numbers of visitors, for example), but as I re-read it I can see how it might come across as vanity or blatant advertising. If you can suggest revisions I'm open to that, otherwise, as I said, I won't oppose deletion if you feel there is no place for it on Wikipedia. Dangle14 13:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The main issue is that you have no sources other than the website itself. A Wikipedia article on the topic needs secondary sources like newspaper articles.   Da rk Sh ik ar i   14:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough. I won't argue that. Dangle14 14:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not appear to meet the criteria in the WP:WEB guideline. The article also contains unverified statements (i.e. who visits the site). Agent 86 17:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.