Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Models story


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Models story

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnecessary content fork of Model. Prod was removed by page creator without any relevant explanation. Alexius08 (talk) 12:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Not just the prod; he also removed the speedy template. As the person who placed the prod, I obviously concur with Alexius08.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  15:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, it's a content fork written in a non-encyclopaedic tone. Thryduulf (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete As an unnecessary content fork; also WP:OR and WP:Synthesis, and would require WP:TNT to create an article for this title. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 16:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:OR. Iowateen (talk) 20:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:OR, WP:SYNTH. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete junk. JuJube (talk) 08:15, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - that's not an encyclopedia article; that's an essay. -- Whpq (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.