Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Lunisolar Calendar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Modern Lunisolar Calendar


The author of this proposed calendar reform, Dr. Irv Bomberg, requested that this article be deleted as original, unpublished, research in Talk:Modern Lunisolar Calendar, where discussion from the original proposed deletion resides. The prod was contested by the anonymous editor 172.200.190.7 who did not give a reason for his objection. When he removed the prod, he made minor edits, citing another discussion in the same e-mail list where Bomberg's original proposal first appeared (also cited in the article). This article still constitutes original research as discussed in What Wikipeda is not. Citing an e-mail list does not satisfy Wikipedia's verifiability policy. The article should be deleted for those reasons. Joe Kress 20:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * AfD listing completed by placing on log page. —C.Fred (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete, original research. I'm also placing Irvember up for deletion under the same logic, though under a separate AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unpublished original research. By the way, Symmetry454 seems to be part of the same system of OR. Demiurge 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Completely NN, completely OR, completely outta here. -- Kicking222 13:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per all above. 14:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-confessed original research. Buck  ets  ofg  14:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates WP:V, fails WP:OR, WP:NFT. -- Kinu t /c  18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, intersting concept, but it's still original research. -- Whpq 17:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.