Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Tahtib


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Tahtib. ...editorially appropriate information to Tahtib. Topic was found to not meet our notability guidelines. j⚛e deckertalk 06:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Modern Tahtib

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a non-notable martial art. Most of the article is an expansion of Tahtib with very little on the modern version which seems to be localized to one teacher in Paris with not a very long history. Best practice wold be to migrate the extra information to Tahtib which currently is only a Stub and delete this article. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect No apparent difference between "modern" and regular tahtib. Lacks significant independent coverage. 109.201.154.178 (talk) 19:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

 Main difference between Tahtib and Modern Tahtib is that Tahtib is a folkloric dance whereas Modern Tahtib is a Martial Art. Modern Tahtib has been recognized and considered as being enough relevant and notable to be part of the 2010 International Martial Art Festival In Paris.
 * Delete/Merge/Redirect Links to videos is not sufficient to show notability. Lacks the coverage necessary to show it meets WP:GNG.  Nothing shows it merits a separate article, but I could live with a merge/redirect. Papaursa (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge into Tahtib Nothing to show this is notable so merge the two articles.204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.