Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Whig Party of Texas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Modern Whig Party. original text not deleted, so someone may use page history to take relevant text to merge into the redirect main article Modern Whig Party Nja 247 10:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Modern Whig Party of Texas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

State division of this party does not as yet deserve its own article, ergo, Notability not noticed necessitating nomination. Toddy1 (talk) 07:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) you never prod'ed the article, nor did you discuss this at all with anyone before AfD'ing it that I can see.
 * 2) ...The reason that you stated for nominating the article doesn't make much sense. — Ω (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Modern Whig Party. The Texas affiliate is not independently notable outside of the national party.  Even less of note than Florida Whig Party, which apparently will survive because the nomination was made by a banned user.  The technicality asserted as a defense here isn't of the same caliber.  "Nor did you discuss this at all with anyone"-- hey, you don't need my permission to nominate an article.  Mandsford (talk) 15:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as notability is not proven through the inclusion of multiple reliable third-party sources as references. Article itself is badly out of date (talk about "early months of 2009" and "June 13, 2009" as being in the future) and reads more than a bit like an advert but those are reasons for cleanup, not AfD.  Perhaps some text could be salvaged for the main party's article? - Dravecky (talk) 18:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to Modern Whig Party as I've suggested in the other two Whig AfD's. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Modern Whig Party Gang14 (talk) 05:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.