Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moditerianism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedily deleted by NawlinWiki. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Moditerianism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article has information that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources and contains a newly coined neologism BigHairRef | Talk 12:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

It's a philosophy I can subscribe to in this case. Delete as nonsense. Emeraude 13:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Indeed so. Complete bollocks. Delete. BTLizard 13:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Speedily, por favor. IronDuke  13:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Just for additional info Im aware the page is listed for speedy but I listed it in case it didn't meet the complete nonsense criteria as there might be more info to come. ALthough I strongly doubt this. BigHairRef | Talk 14:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this definitely meets the speedy criteria. —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  14:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.