Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moe path


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Icewedge (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Moe path

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. A non-notable neologism attributed to an apparently non-notable person and referenced to an alleged book with no Google hits at all (for either its alleged name or its alleged author) apart from this article itself. A hoax, and not a very good one. DanielRigal (talk) 02:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder. No evidence that this term was ever used by anyone other than the creator of this article. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There is insufficient information in the citation to identify the source being cited. I can find no sources discussing any such subject, and we already cover the subject of trails that animals, aeroplanes, and boats leave behind at, unsurprisingly, animal tracks, contrail, and wake.  There's no need for a duplicate article at this title, and no need for either redirect or disambiguation for a name that isn't actually used for any of those, or even for anything at all, from what I can determine.  Delete. Uncle G (talk) 02:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Neologisms must go. §FreeRangeFrog 02:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. Existing articles mentioned by Uncle G already cover these in more detail without making up words. - Mgm|(talk) 14:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.