Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohabbat Khawab Safar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If people think redirecting is a better idea, that can be done outside of this AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Mohabbat Khawab Safar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesnt meet WP:NFILM Zazzysa (talk) 16:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete No verifiable indication that establishes notability under WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:NFILM is not the applicable guideline, WP:TVSERIES is. Per that guideline, notability is indicated if the program airs on a national TV network (which seems to be the case with Hum TV). Since it's an Urdu-language TV show, searching for sources in English will probably not work. There is at least one source in the article that indicates that further coverage likely exists. I have added a find sources box with the Urdu-language title at the top, hopefully someone who speaks Urdu can check. At the very least, it can be redirected to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV though, so deletion is no option. Regards  So  Why  15:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * redirect I agree with SoWhy. If not enough english sources can be found to support a proper article on the en.wiki redirecting is the best option. L3X1  (distænt write)   )evidence(  14:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The article meets requirements of WP:TVSERIES and if it is not, I am helping improve this article.
 * Keep - Yup, SoWhy has nailed the appropriate guideline, as well as the rationale using that guideline.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.