Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohabbat Ki Kasam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As per usual leniency is given to pre 90s articles as sources are always next to none impossible to find - I personally believe there's sources offline, Anyway consensus is to Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 01:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Mohabbat Ki Kasam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability tag for 3.5 years. I tried searching for sources but couldn't find any- found lots for a song of the same name, but no evidence of connection. Only sources I could find were and, which show they exist, but nothing else. Fails WP:GNG abd WP:NFILM. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Likely delete as searches found no good sources aside from Books and IMDb lists no awards so there may not be any. SwisterTwister   talk  04:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This does meet GNG and Film requirements. It's from a dark period in Hindi cinema though which is poorly documented. I'd imagine reviews and coverage in Indian newspapers of the period. which aren't online too.♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Blofeld's reasoning. -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 12:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Original Hindi:
 * ALT: WP:INDAFD: Mohabbat Ki Kasam मोहब्बत की कसम
 * Film year:
 * Director:
 * Producer:
 * Banner:


 * Keep pre-internet Indian sources are near impossible to find. But this topic is verifiable and has made it into the enduring historical record.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.