Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohair berets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  16:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Mohair berets

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No reliable sources, original research for satirical term used by political opponents non encyclopedic. Phrase known only in google by wiki mirrors. Mathiasrex (talk) 12:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The New Statesman ref is a source for it as far back as 2005. It seems to have just as much credence as the many other minor political labels in ciirculation. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Offensive, yes, but that is not a reason to delete. One good source is provided and the material seems to be solid enough. Kitfoxxe (talk) 14:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs a bit of wikifying, but no need to delete. There's at least one reliable enough source. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are several mentions in Polish News Bulletin for 2005 and 2006 (eg here and here), which provide reliable sources. Jimmy Pitt   talk  15:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, claims made in nomination ("no reliable sources", "original research"), while doubtless made in good faith, are patently untrue.--Kotniski (talk) 07:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.