Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohak Bariatrics and Robotics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Mohak Bariatrics and Robotics

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sources are all routine announcements of operations performed which do not appear independent. No in-depth coverage for WP:NCORP found. PROD removed by author. Hemantha (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hemantha (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Hemantha (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hemantha (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. It's an advertisement.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. Mohak Bariatrics and Robotics is a one of its kind and a well known hospital in India dedicated to obesity surgery. The sources cited are not just the routine announcements of the operations performed but rare surgeries performed in India. Also, it is a centre that prepares surgeons for this disease. Many people around the globe search for it on a daily basis. The references cited are all independent ones. If there's an issue with the content, I suggest it should be properly tagged for improvement, rather than being deleted.Edwige9 (talk) 06:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see any significant coverage from reliable independent sources. Most of these sources are either published by the subject, have either passing mentions or no mention at all, or won't load/404 Naleksuh (talk) 06:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I searched for more references in Google but most of them mention the hospital name only. Although the entity exists but has no significant coverage as of now. Is it possible to remove the content and sources that don't look credible and add a maintenance tag. The reason being, I remember I was involved in one of the discussions about a remote religious place wherein the subject had no media coverage, but due to its physical existence, the editor didn't remove it. If this is not the case, then whatever the community decides. Please share your views. Edwige9 (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * See WP:FAILORG for ways of preserving information of a non-notable organization without keeping this page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I have tried very hard to find evidence that the subject, which has a good claim to significance, has the sources to meet GNG, but despite checking all the references and a Google search, I am unable to do so. The text as it stands is promotional, and with that many failed verifications/dead links it is difficult to assume good faith, so it seems best to delete the article. Toadspike (talk) 20:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, and my own standards for hospitals. Bearian (talk) 20:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. Fails WP:NHOSPITAL. - Hatchens (talk) 12:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.