Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Traoré (French footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Mohamed Traoré (French footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no evidence in the article that he has played in a fully professional league, thus failing WP:NFOOTBALL. Do we keep the article until such time or delete it? Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:47, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:48, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage in reliable source, meaning this article fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The term "non-professional" says it all. Clear failure of WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. – Michael (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * delete as noted above fails notability on several fronts.Righteousskills (talk) 00:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - I reckon this article is actually speedy-able, seeing as it actually claims the subject is unimportant by wikipedia standards ("non-professional"). Fails NFOOTBALL. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 10:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of significant coverage by sources. Fails to meet the general notability guideline and the notability guideline for sports.-- xanchester  (t)  00:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.