Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad A. Quayum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Lourdes  16:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Mohammad A. Quayum
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionable notability. Also, have doubt about the cited references. ~ Moheen  (keep talking) 22:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   23:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   23:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   23:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep = assuming it's all true, he has quite the c.v., although I'd love to see better sourcing. Bearian (talk) 23:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This was nominated for deletion in 2012, when the article title did not include a middle initial. The result of that discussion was keep. Since then, the list of potential references under external links has been beefed up, and now includes reviews of his work in The Statesman, Esquire, The Book Review, Humanities Diliman, and The Daily Star, to name a few. The external links should be mined for content and turned into references, but the nom's unspecified "doubt about the cited references" is not a sufficient argument for deletion. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.