Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Akhtar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Essex Cricket Board List A players. To be honest, recent outcomes of AfD about cricketers depend on the participants too much. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 04:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Mohammad Akhtar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nothing in searches, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  05:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable cricketer, played in List A cricket per WP:NCRIC.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Essex Cricket Board List A players Has played 1 List A match, but there's only really coverage of his club career and nothing significant to pass GNG. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where a player with one or a few matches, but no coverage, is redirected/deleted, and there is a suitable WP:ATD here. Nominator perhaps should have been BOLD and redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or weak redirect to List of Essex Cricket Board List A players. No significant coverage, aside from the usual scorecard databases it's mostly passing mentions in routine club cricket reports, so fails WP:GNG. This trumps the extremely trivial (and arguable fail) of WP:NCRIC, which has proven a very unreliable indicator of suitability for standalone articles. Played one List A match for a cricket board XI – that is plainly not the highest standard of domestic cricket, irrespective of the opponents and the competition's status. wjematherplease leave a message... 13:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete article completely and fully fails GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.