Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Al Ajlouni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Mohammad Al Ajlouni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO, non-notable JMHamo (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 *  Keep Neutral. If article is to be believed, passes WP:JOURNALIST. Xxanthippe (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find sources that verifies he passes WP:JOURNALIST; I can't even find sources that makes him pass WP:BASIC. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:05, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as nothing at all actually suggesting the necessary notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Article written with too much fluff. Seems to be written for self-promotion. Leaning towards delete, due to too much fluff, yet not much notability. Conspirasee1 (talk) 10:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  20:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.