Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Al Hammad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Mohammad Al Hammad

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no substantive coverage of the subject in english-language sources. As far as I can tell, the subject is a run-of-the-mill business person who sometimes writes op-eds. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 3.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being appointed to a sinecure by the royal family and then making a living by issuing statements praising the royal family isn’t really the stuff Wikipedia notability is made of. Mccapra (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: There is no substantive coverage of the subject in english-language sources is irrelevant, because Wikipedia does not depend on substantive coverage in English-language sources. (This is not a !vote, and therefore not an assumption on whether or not the subject has substantive coverage in any language.) Vaticidalprophet 21:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The language is purposely hedged so that speakers of other languages can assess whether there are sources in other languages that cover the subject. A lack of coverage in English-speaking sources is one indicator of lack of notability, but is not conclusive. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete another in a long line of non-notable businessmen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.