Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Asrar Rehbar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Mohammad Asrar Rehbar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. No senior fully-professional appearances.PROD was removed by an IP without proper explanation Kichu🐘 Discuss 04:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 04:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 04:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 04:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --BlameRuiner (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete:fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Poppi fied  talk 08:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, as well as our current WP:NFOOTY (this league is being discussed at WT:FPL. Nevertheless, GNG is most important. Joseph<b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 11:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, looks like WP:TOOSOON. --  Jammumylove  Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 20:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The I-League 2nd Division in which the player plays is clearly a fully professional league according to WikiProject Football/fully professinal league guidlines, which makes the player notable according to the general notability guidlines. The same is also being discussed at WT:FPL106.51.104.209 (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It is being discussed at WT:FPL, but there is definitely not a consensus that this league is FPL. And it is not "clearly an FPL" if you actually read that discussion. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 09:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - the coverage is not significant enough to pass WP:GNG. End of. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.