Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Mansouryar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 04:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Mohammad Mansouryar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod template was removed by IP, reason was "Notability?" PaterMcFly talk contribs 15:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. only 4 cites on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:29, 7 August 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF and WP:BLP. None of the sources in the articles seem to be reliable independent sources as required by WP:RS. No indication of notability. Self-publishing a paper on arXiv is not enough. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 14:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The level of academic impact of his works and his non-standard academic career path suggests WP:FRINGE may be a more appropriate standard than WP:PROF — in any case he is not even close to passing WP:PROF — but WP:FRINGE demands reliable sourcing for its subjects (which we need in any case even for non-fringe subjects), and we don't have that either. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.