Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammadi Begum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Mohammadi Begum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mostly it is Original Research. Furthermore it does not satisfy notability by itself, so the only mention should be on the Mirza Ghulam Ahmad article, and that too with RS. Thirdly it uses known hate site "irshad" (I have no idea why it has not been black listed yet). There is also a concern about some information being bogus, but I think instead of CSD an XFD is better. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 (c)  23:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Delete as per nom: in fact, WP:NUKE applies. It is complete WP:OR, totally WP:POV, and in fact WP:PULPIT. There are no WP:RS for this lady dying in 1966; only a more recent set of events (a presumably unrelated woman, currently held captive in Pakistan) which I assume are unrelated. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  14:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.