Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Faizan Ul Haq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Mohammed Faizan Ul Haq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Being interviewed a couple of times and publishing a newspaper article (which looks to be more of a vox pops item) does not meet Wikipedia's criteria. Contested proposed deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  20:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The article in Namasthe Telangana and News in T News. Do not the page delete. The information of News source is correct you can check reference links: Interview by T News. Article Publish in Namaste Telangana. User:Mohammedfaizanulhaq 20:52, 3 February 2019


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:BIO, nothing significant (yet?) about this person, also WP:NOTPROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:BIO, clearly an WP:Autobiography about a subject that has not yet done anything significant. The articles and youtube videos from news are only about snippet and minor statements from the subject among other participants in an event. Please read that WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV (significant coverage) is needed to justify an article. currently it is lacking. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  08:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The closing admin should also delete Draft:Mohammed Faizan Ul Haq that is a Promo copy of the same. This user's userpage has already been twice deleted for being misused as a WP:WEBHOST-- D Big X ray ᗙ  08:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from secondary reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 12:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.