Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Farhan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Mohammed Farhan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

See WP:NACTOR Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete unlesss better sourcing can be found as I see no improvement here. SwisterTwister   talk  20:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not reveal anything to show they meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Alts:
 * working name:
 * name in Hindi:
 * WP:INDAFD: "Farhan Khan" "Mohammed Farhan" "फरहान खान"

*Keep per my own searches showing this person as meeting WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. etc. Come on, , and ... if BASIC and GNG are met, we do not go to NACTOR to find weakness. Pardon, but in your WP:BEFORE didn't any of you think check to through WP:INDAFD for this Indian topic?? its a poor stub yes, but for a topic expandable and sourcable a topic notability is found through coverage, and coverage we have. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment felt I need to strike my keep. While yes there IS an actor named  "Farhan Khan"  who is arguably notable, after comparing the age and career of the notable one with the one written of here, I am now convinced that this existing article is not about the notable one I was defending above. Biggest clue was the picture. Compare this one with the notable one... NOT the same person.  I suggest no prejudice should an article be written on the older Farhan Khan.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.