Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Hijab (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. This was the same article as last time this went through AFD, reposted. Uncle G (talk) 18:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Mohammed Hijab
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable person, doesn't pass WP:GNG. nearlyevil 665  09:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  09:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: per CSD G4 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Hijab (2nd nomination)) CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Perhaps a salt is in order too? nearlyevil  665  10:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIOPipsally (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability guideline and no WP:RS. TheChronium (talk) 10:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - I have submitted a case at SPI; see Sockpuppet investigations/Hassanjunoir999. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: per CommanderWaterford. Mosesheron (talk) 10:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as WP:G4 but also likely WP:G5 pending CU Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G4 and G5 (I just requested admin action in the SPI) – the recreation is word-for-word identical. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 10:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.