Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Ibrahim (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Mohammed Ibrahim (footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has been unsourced since 2009, can't find any reliable sources to verify that player existed TonyStarks (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. TonyStarks (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as unreferenced BLP. BLPPROD doesn't apply, but due to an absence of sources to verify this individual's notability (or existence), there is no option but to delete. Cloudz 679 11:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Player, if exists, fails WP:GNG. Jared Preston (talk) 12:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:11, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL; no evidence of notability. ~ Feedintm Parley 13:35, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. It would be helpful if people making such confident claims that the subject fails notability guidelines could tell us what evidence they are basing those claims on, for example by detailing where they have looked for sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you mean with regards to WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL? Or both?  Mattythewhite (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.