Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Naseeruddin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Mohammed Naseeruddin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NPOL and presented here as self WP:PROMOTION that can be concluded from the creator username — Amkgp  💬  15:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp  💬  15:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp  💬  15:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. No passage of WP:NPOL and cited coverage does not show anything extraordinary that should make him an exception (WP:MILL). - Tristan Surtel (talk) 15:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and honestly probably speedy delete. The article was created by User:Mohammed Naseeruddin GHMC, suggesting an WP:AUTOBIO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Local politician without the level of coverage needed to meet WP:NPOL. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Promotional article. WP:MILL. Timberlack (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sockstrike. Blablubbs | talk 20:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Article was created by a blocked or banned user (Asimrasool1998) in violation of block or ban. The article's creator, User:Mohammed Naseeruddin GHMC is a sockpuppet of the blocked user User:Asimrasool1998. -- Connicky Cock Discuss with Connicky 13:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - due to NPOL failure and, to be frank, because I really passionately hate people using Wikipedia as a platform for promotion Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.