Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Saeed Al Sheikh Khaz'al


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As an administrative note, please don't strike other editor's comments. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Mohammed Saeed Al Sheikh Khaz'al

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced biography with vague claims, none of them on their face amounting to notability. Cabayi (talk) 14:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 14:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep . . this person to claims significance as a major diplomat working for the UAE. i hope that eligible notability but need to source . —Swe123123 (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC
 * significance is the criterion for speedy deletion, for AFD notability needs to be shown; the article claims "he acted as the middleman" not as a major diplomat; and no sources are provided for any of the claims. Cabayi (talk) 10:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete absolutely no sourcing, middle of the road diplomat. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Deleted. . not eligible notability & no sourcing . —Swe123123 (talk) 06:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete.   Has no sources.--AfPEN (talk) 14:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: only just has a credible claim of significance, however, he doesn't seem to have attracted significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and therefore fails the general notability guideline.   SITH   (talk)   15:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.