Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohan Joshi (healer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Mohan Joshi (healer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This healer fails the notability guidelines for biographies, as no sources were found. The notability tag was recently removed without explanation, and I have restored it. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: A promotional article created by a blocked user and subsequently edited by IPs (including a fake notice on the Talk page proclaiming a Keep conclusion to this AfD). The sources provided are postings/advertorials which come complete with the subject's contact details to arrange a consultation session. My searches are not finding better. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete While the Hindu and DNA are notable periodicals, the two articles cited (dated 2000 and 2014) appear to be advertorials. Kannadigaworld is not a reliable source.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 08:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment The Hindu article is clearly not an ad. One may dislike its contents, but this is irrelevant as far as notability is concerned. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 08:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It concludes with "He visits Belgaum for two days a month (2491, Income Tax Colony, Mahantesh Nagar, Belgaum. ph.No.454989.)"; provision of such contact information usually occurs only in advertorial items, i.e. items seeking to obtain business for rather than provide disinterested information about a subject. AllyD (talk) 09:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * "usually occurs only in advertorial items"? Really? Who says that? What credibility does your statement have? Are you a reliable source while the Hindu is not? 84.73.134.206 (talk) 11:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Apparent advertorials as sources supporting quackery. Fails WP:GNG. Jschnur (talk) 22:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. Legacypac (talk) 01:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.