Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohit Rajhans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Mohit Rajhans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. WP:BLP of a journalist and film festival programmer, written with a marked advertorial skew and referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage about him shown at all. As always, Wikipedia is not a public relations platform on which a person is entitled to have an article just because he exists; he must be reliably sourceable as satisfying a notability criterion to earn an article, but the content and sourcing here don't accomplish that. Bearcat (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough coverage in reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.