Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsen Esmaeili


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   revert and speedy close —David Eppstein (talk) 19:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Mohsen Esmaeili

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PhD student, far from passing WP:NPROF. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment I just realised it used to be an article about a different person with the same name - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohsen_Esmaeili&oldid=965007417. So I'd be happy if it was just reverted back to that. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment. Hmm, I am not even sure how to !vote here. Certainly this edit by User:Mohsenesmaeili1991, which created the current version of the article, was highly inappropriate and even block-worthy. The edit removed a previously existing article about a clearly notable subject and replaced it by an article about the subject with the same name who is clearly non-notable. Moreover, based on the username, User:Mohsenesmaeili1991, it is likely that we are dealing with a WP:AUTO situation here. The edit should certainly be reverted, but it would be even better if an admin performed a selected revdel here and removed from the page history the edits introduced by User:Mohsenesmaeili1991. So perhaps some form of speedy close+selected revdel would be an appropriate outcome here. Nsk92 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  13:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Revert to original form - this new autobiographical CV is totally inappropriate and the fact that they've replaced a notable person's article with this just makes it worse Spiderone  13:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy revert This is blatant page hijacking replaced with a résumé, this should have been created as a new article or draft. I would consider this page hijacking to be gaming the system in my opinion, since they are not autoconfirmed and can't create new articles, they've just gone and hijacked an existing article. Additionally, they assert that It was the description of other person in Iran goverment who is supporting ideas against human rights. in their edit summary. Dylsss(talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 14:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy revert and snow close. Hijacking for self promotion. --T*U (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Revert I have never seen such a horrible mess. We really need to block that new user. This is his only edit, but it is so grossely inapropriate I do not see any hope for him. It is his only edits at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.