Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsen Soori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ignoring all the non-policy based !votes by SPAs, the consensus is clearly to delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Mohsen Soori

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A biography of a researcher - effectively a repetition of his Google home page. The contributor and an IP have repeatedly erased maintenance tags without providing the 3rd party references sought by those tags. The subject is one among multiple authors of 8 papers - some of which the contributor has also added as a reference to other articles - but I don't see these as sufficient to meet the WP:ACADEMIC #1 or wider WP:BASIC biographical notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 08:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Latinoo.west (talk) 9:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google scholar h-index 3 is not even close to WP:PROF and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above. The creator of this BLP showed a serious error of judgement. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as an advertisement with there also not being anything for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. SwisterTwister   talk  23:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep.It is a short biography from Mohsen Soori as a living person. The page has worth enough to be kept in order to present a short statement about the Mohsen Soori's achievements. So, I am disagree for deletion of the page.

JIM.Artor (talk) 9:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep.I also think that the page should be kept. Because, it can help to the his college to be more familiar with the person. Also, the Wikipedia page can be seen more.

Amirhossini (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think the page can be edited and saved.
 * Comment: Please note that neither being a living person nor helping his college provides an argument which can justify a Wikipedia article: see the notability criteria which were linked in the rationale. AllyD (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please see the Virtual machining page. The articles of the Mohsen Soori and other authors are the main references of the page. So, the page can help to the other readers to know more about him.

JIM.Artor (talk) 10:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I saw the Virtual machining page. I think the page can be saved as a result of his publications in the page. Jana.Tima (talk) 06:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC) — Jana.Tima (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep. The page can be kept. Because, more approach to the research efforts can be achieved. Sa.meiyem (talk) 06:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC) — Sa.meiyem (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment. Most of the red links appear to be spas. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC).
 * Interesting. The red links have suddenly turned blue! This seems to be an effective way of encouraging editors. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC).


 * Keep. I agree for keeping. Timon.R (talk) 08:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC) — Timon.R (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * And does the spa have reasons based on policy? Xxanthippe (talk) 04:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC).

I think your effort is a spa. Timon.R (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The page can be improved. JIM.Bordas (talk) 12:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: The invitation to improve the page has been and is there: that is the purpose of the maintenance tags. But as it stands, there is still not one reliable 3rd party source to support the biographical content and only a CV list of articles which the subject has part-authored. AllyD (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The page is now linked to the Virtual machining page. As the creator of the Virtual machining page, please keep the page Mohsen Soori in order to help to the other readers to know more about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirhossini (talk • contribs) 10:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Adding mutual "see also" links between the page in question and another page on Wikipedia does not establish notability. What is needed is reliable 3rd party sources about the subject. AllyD (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The page is now linked to the Virtual machining page. As the creator of the Virtual machining page, please keep the page Mohsen Soori in order to help to the other readers to know more about him.Amirhossini (talk) 11:01, 12§ November 2016 (UTC) (Duplicate struck out. AllyD (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC))
 * Comment: I think creating a scientific page as virtual machining which is based on about 180 published papers in field of virtual machining can create notability. The page is helping to the people knowledge in virtual machining with a simple presenting. So, all readers can see biography of main author of the page as Mohsen Soori. On the other hand, responsibility of the presented knowledge in the virtual machining page is also with Mohsen Soori.§

Amirhossini (talk) 01:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.