Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsin Nawaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  09:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Mohsin Nawaz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:Actor. cited sources are not reliable enough. Saqib (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Mohsin Nawaz is a notable personality of Pakistan and i am personally a admirer of him. People idealize him and he is a source of inspiration for us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MajidaKhanum (talk • contribs) 10:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * — MajidaKhanum (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Too many SPA's involved with this bio, suspected socks needs to be investigated. User:Fdeeba, User:Haroon Christy, User:MajidaKhanum, User:Drshaziarehman. --Saqib (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I think the claims of sockpuppetry should be withdrawn as this isn't the proper venue to make unsubstantiated claims. As for the article, the sources are too weak and there isn't enough to demonstrate the individual passes WP:GNG.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 13:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia's notability standards for radio broadcasters do not include "MajidaKhanum is an admirer", but require reliable source coverage about the broadcaster in media independent of his own self-published web presence. None of the sources here are satisfying what's required, however — right across the board, the referencing here is to YouTube videos, Facebook, "staff" profiles on the websites of companies or organizations with which he's directly affiliated, user-generated "open platforms for sharing viral content", and on and so forth. Exactly zero of the sources shown here even begin to approach what's required — and whether he's your hero or not, this is still not the kind of sourcing it takes to make him eligible for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 02:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.