Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohua Mukherjee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. good work by NA1K on sourcing. v/r - TP 19:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Mohua Mukherjee

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This article about a social activist and an author does not provide any RS. Apart from style and tone issue, the notability of this person is under doubt. Twice put for PROD, but the tag was removed, without any substantial development or rework on the article. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  05:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep As per the sources and the work done by Northamerica1000, the article seems to be within keep territory. Amartyabag   TALK2ME  11:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

keep it is notable.[]Bhavinkundaliya (talk) 08:02, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per multiple book sources. Passes GNG. Cavarrone (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Though the notability is proved, the article still doesn't meet WP:BLP. There is not a single inline citation in the article. Amartyabag   TALK2ME  14:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sources of the biography are indicated, so this is not an "unsourced" BLP. The lack of inline citations is surely a bad thing, but not a reason to delete. Cavarrone (talk) 06:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The links are not sources for the biography but are links to the openlibrary of the books written by Mohua Mukherjee. Those links tells nothing about her. Amartyabag   TALK2ME  15:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * A source from Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh has been added to the article. It's a passing mention, but nevertheless, a source is now present in the article. Therefore, the article is not an unsourced BLP at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | gab _ 18:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

 Third relist rationale: Hoping to see some discussion on the lack of reliable, independent sources on this BLP. -Scottywong | gossip _ 18:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Some sources, essentially mentions of Mohua Mukherjee activities and works. Perhaps more sources are available in Indian-language publications.
 * ISBN 8182053897
 * ISBN 0819568376
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 03:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 03:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Here's a summary of Mukherjee's works from WorldCat: Search results for 'Mohua Mukherjee, Ph. D'. Many of these works were researched and published in conjunction with the World Bank. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Another source found:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 03:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 03:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve. Note that additional sources have been found by searching under the name "Mahua Mukherjee" and "Dr. Mahua Mukherjee" . The topic is meeting passing WP:GNG and passing WP:BASIC:
 * Significant coverage:
 * Significant coverage:
 * Not quite significant coverage, but beyond passing mentions, and covers Mukherjee's dance work and research:
 * It is very likely that additional sources are available from Indian-language sources, a language I'm not fluent in. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:40, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Another source found; the reliability of the publication may be contentious (or maybe not):
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 03:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 03:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - More sources found from The Daily Star:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 04:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 04:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 04:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as per the sources found by Northamerica1000. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: no consensus to delete, despite SW's rational 3rd relisting.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep due to the sources found by Northamerica1000--  Ð ℬig  XЯaɣ  14:53, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.