Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moisés Espírito Santo Bagagem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Moisés Espírito Santo Bagagem

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Previously deleted and salted as Moisés Espírito Santo. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Religion, Social science,  and Portugal.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - normally I'm a quick "delete it again!" for recreation of salted material, but in this case the author has waited 16 years since the last delete and 18 since the original AfD, which is more than enough time for a subject's actual notability and our community consensus to change (and though I cannot access the deleted version, the writer seems to have taken to heart the comments from the 2006 AfD). So I'll urge !voters to give this a fresh look, ignoring the previous salt. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Nobody other than me waited 16 years - this was created in 2010 and flew under the radar for those years. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails the WP:GNG criteria and is not saved by WP:NACADEMIC. And the fact that this brochure has been created by one kamikaze account and curated by a couple of "others", does not help. Ignore the advice of cardiologists and salt generously. -The Gnome (talk) 15:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.